Terminal and Port Plan Submissions
Contact
Terminal Plans are a planning document that was required to be submitted to CARB by regulated marine terminal operators (or port staff, on behalf of terminal operators) discussing how a regulated terminal intends to comply with the requirements of the At Berth Regulation. The requirements for a terminal plan are found in Section 93130.14(a) of the Regulation. More information about Terminal Plans can be found here.
Terminal Plans were due to CARB by December 1, 2021. Once received, CARB staff had 90 days to review Plan submittals and identify any deficiencies in the Plan(s). CARB provided written responses to every submitted Terminal Plan confirming either Plan completeness or identifying deficiencies to applicable terminals. The below table includes the original and revised (as applicable) Terminal Plans, as well as the written communication from CARB to the Terminal Plan submitter.
Terminal Name | Terminal Plan | CARB Response | Plan Complete? |
Container | |||
Hueneme – South Terminal | Yes | ||
Long Beach – ITS (Pier G) | Yes | ||
Long Beach – LBCT (Pier E) | Yes | ||
Long Beach – PCT (Pier J) | Yes | ||
Long Beach – SSA (Pier A) | Yes | ||
Long Beach – SSA (Pier C) | Yes | ||
Long Beach - TTI (Pier T) | Yes | ||
Los Angeles – APM | Yes | ||
Los Angeles – Everglades (Berths 121, 126) | Yes | ||
Los Angeles - Everport | Yes | ||
Los Angeles – Fenix Marine | Yes | ||
Los Angeles - TraPac | Yes | ||
Los Angeles – WBCT (Berths 100, 102) | Yes | ||
Los Angeles – Yusen | Yes | ||
Oakland – Everport | Yes | ||
Oakland – OICT | Yes | ||
Oakland – Berth 63 | Yes | ||
Oakland - TraPac | Yes | ||
San Diego – Tenth Avenue Marine Terminal | Yes | ||
Cruise | |||
Long Beach – Cruise Terminal | Yes | ||
Los Angeles – World Cruise Terminal | Yes | ||
San Diego – | Yes | ||
San Diego - | Yes | ||
San Francisco | Yes | ||
Ro-Ro | |||
Benicia – AM Ports | Yes | ||
Hueneme – | Yes | ||
Long Beach – SSA Marine (Pier F) | Yes | ||
Long Beach – | Yes | ||
Los Angeles – WWL | Yes | ||
Richmond – | Yes | ||
San Diego – National City Marine Terminal | Revised Plan (Sept. 2022) Revised Plan (Feb. 2023) | Yes | |
San Francisco – Pasha Terminal (Pier 80) | Yes | ||
Tanker | |||
Carquinez – PBF Martinez Refining Co. | No | ||
Carquinez – Tesoro (Avon/Amorco) | Yes | ||
Carquinez – TransMontaigne Martinez | Yes | ||
Carquinez – Valero | Yes | ||
| Crockett – NuStar Selby | No | ||
Long Beach – Olympus |
| Yes | |
Long Beach – Tesoro (Pier B/Pier T/LBT) | Yes | ||
Long Beach – Vopak | Yes | ||
Los Angeles – Kinder Morgan (Berth 118/119) | Yes | ||
Los Angeles – PBF Energy Southwest Terminal | Yes | ||
Los Angeles – Phillips 66 (Berths 148/149 & 150/151) | Yes | ||
Los Angeles – Shell Mormon Island (Berths 167-169) | Yes | ||
Los Angeles – Ultramar/Valero/NuStar (Berth 163) | No | ||
Los Angeles – Ultramar (Berth 164) | Yes | ||
Los Angeles – Vopak | Yes | ||
Richmond – Chevron | Yes | ||
Richmond – International Matex Tank Terminals | Original Plan | Request for Revisions | No |
Richmond – Kinder Morgan (RCH 9) | Yes | ||
Richmond – Kinder Morgan (RCH 11) | Yes | ||
Richmond – Phillips 66 (RCH 11) | Yes | ||
Richmond – TransMontaigne Richmond | Yes | ||
Rodeo – Phillips 66 Rodeo Marine Terminal | Yes | ||
Stockton – Berth 7/8 | Yes | ||
Port Plans are a planning document that was required to be submitted to CARB by regulated marine ports discussing how a regulated port intends to comply with the requirements of the At Berth Regulation. The requirements for a port plan are found in Section 93130.14(b) of the Regulation. More information about Port Plans can be found here.
Port Plans were due to CARB by December 1, 2021. Once received, CARB staff had 90 days to review Plan submittals and identify any deficiencies in the Plan(s). CARB provided written responses to every submitted Port Plan confirming either Plan completeness or identifying deficiencies to applicable terminals. The below table includes the original and revised (as applicable) Port Plans, as well as the written communication from CARB to the Port Plan submitter.
Port Name | Port Plan | CARB Response | Plan Complete? |
Hueneme | Yes | ||
Long Beach | Yes | ||
Los Angeles | Revised Plan for Kinder Morgan (Berth 118/119) Revised Plan for Phillips 66 (Berths 148/149 & 150/151) | Letter of Incompleteness | No |
Oakland | Yes | ||
Richmond | Yes | ||
San Diego | Yes | ||
San Francisco | Yes | ||
Stockton | Yes |
Attachments
More Information on Terminal and Port Plans
Difficulty Accessing Material
If you need assistance opening files please contact staff at shorepower@arb.ca.gov.
Contact us if there is any difficulty accessing material so the problem can be corrected and/or the information can be provided in an alternative format. Report any accessibility issues by contacting CARB Web Accessibility at (800) 242-4450.