California Air Resources Board

Summary

Would have prohibited a city or county from imposing or enforcing minimum parking requirements on housing development projects located within one-half mile of a major transit stop, except as
specified. Held on suspense in the Assembly Appropriations Committee.

View full bill text here

Summary

Would have established a program for planning and projects to make California’s transportation more resilient to the impacts of climate change. Was not heard in the Assembly Transportation Committee.

View full bill text here

Summary

Requires the circulation element of a general plan to include specified contents related to bicycle plans, pedestrian plans, and traffic calming plans, and requires the implementation of those plans.

View full bill text here

Summary

Expands California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) exemptions for specified transit, bicycle, and pedestrian projects, and extends these exemptions from 2023 to 2030.

View full bill text here

Summary

Would have required the Bay Area Metropolitan Transportation Commission to develop and adopt a Connected Network Plan, develop a comprehensive, standardized regional transit mapping and wayfinding system, develop an implementation and maintenance strategy and funding plan, and establish open data standards, as specified. The bill would have required the region’s transit agencies, as defined, to comply with those established regional transit mapping and wayfinding system, implementation and maintenance strategy and funding plan, and open data standards, as provided. Held on Suspense in Assembly Appropriations Committee.

View full bill text here

Summary

Exempts university housing projects from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) until 2030, if the projects meet specified requirements, including an independent third-party evaluation of whether the project results in net additional emission of greenhouse gases, qualifying for Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design platinum level, and other environmental and labor requirements.

View full bill text here

Summary

Would have prohibited the land use element from designating land uses that have the potential to significantly degrade local air, water, or soil quality or to adversely impact health outcomes in disadvantaged communities to be located, or to materially expand, within or adjacent to a disadvantaged community or a racially and ethnically concentrated area of poverty. Was not heard in the Senate Committee on Government and Finance.

View full bill text here

Summary

Would have retired CARB’s existing SB 375  (Steinberg, Chapter 728, Statutes of 2008) guidelines, limited CARB’s oversight of the SB 375 program, and required CARB to appoint a State-Regional Collaborative that would have set implementable 2030 and 2050 regional greenhouse gas targets by developing a point system tool, which CARB would have been required to use to assess Sustainable Communities Strategies (SCS). This bill also would have authorized metropolitan planning organizations to appeal CARB rejection of an SCS. Was not heard in the Senate Transportation Committee.

View full bill text here

Summary

Would have updated the SB 375 (Steinberg, Chapter 728, Statutes of 2008) program and added new requirements for the entities involved in developing Sustainable Communities Strategies (SCS). CARB would have been required to adopt additional greenhouse gas targets for 2045 and 2050 for SCSs and vehicle miles traveled targets for 2035, 2045, 2050, by 2024. CARB would have received additional time to review SCSs and been required to reject them if they were not implementable based on specific evidentiary basis. Metropolitan planning organizations would have been required to work with CARB on technical methodologies, submit draft SCS for CARB review 90 days before adoption, respond to CARB comments on the draft, and submit final SCS for CARB evaluation within 60 days after adoption. Local government would have been required to collect data on housing, jobs, and transit infrastructure and report every two years to metropolitan planning organizations demonstrating how SCS strategies are implemented, including the data described above. Was not heard in the Senate Committee on Transportation.

View full bill text here

Summary

Would have established fire hazard planning responsibilities for local governments and required cities and counties to make specified findings on fire standards prior to permitting residential development in a very high fire hazard severity zone. Also, would have established a grant program to provide funding to small jurisdictions that contain very high fire risk areas for wildfire risk reduction planning activities, to be administered by the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. Was not heard in the Assembly Housing and Community Development

View full bill text here