Outcomes and Results for Clean Cars 4 All

Cumulative Outcomes as of June 1, 2024

$464 million allocated*
$189 million implemented
$88.8 million benefitting priority populations**
21,900 vehicles implemented***
98,700 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO₂e) reductions***
211.1 tons of oxides of nitrogen (NO_x) reductions***
38.1 tons of hydrocarbon (HC) and reactive organic gases (ROG) reductions***
6 tons of particulate matter (PM) reductions***

*Total for all CC4A funding includes amounts from the Enhanced Fleet Modernization Program (EFMP) Plus Up and the Statewide CC4A, which is administered through the Driving Clean Assistance Program.

**Priority populations include residents of: (1) census tracts identified as disadvantaged by California Environmental Protection Agency per Senate Bill 535; (2) census tracts identified as low-income per Assembly Bill (AB) 1550; or (3) a low-income household per AB 1550.

***Based on $189M funding implemented.

Zero-Emission Vehicle Insights Dashboard

CARB’s Incentive Program Insights data dashboard allows dashboard visitors to interact with and visualize data on the Clean Cars 4 All (CC4A) Program as well as CARB’s other light duty incentive programs.

Vehicles Replaced and Purchased through CC4A and the Enhanced Fleet Modernization Program (EFMP)

The table below summarizes program information by implementing air districts through December 31, 2024.

		Number of Vehicles Purchased with a CC4A and/or EFMP Incentive
District	Number of Vehicles Replaced	BEV	PHEV	Hybrid	FCEV	Conventional	Mobility Options
South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD)	11,407	1,796	5,393	3,672	92	401	53
San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (APCD)	7,652	1,257	3,494	2,713	1	187	0
Bay Area AQMD	4,196	1,683	1,211	1,126	65	0	111
Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD	1,107	433	502	170	2	0	0
San Diego APCD	126	60	26	40	0	0	0
Totals	24,488	5,229	10,626	7,720	160	588	164

Socioeconomic Benefits

In a continued effort to provide transparency and commitment to data, CARB is taking measures to improve data collection for the evaluation, analysis, and reporting of socioeconomic benefits for program participants. This includes an updated survey to provide for more streamlined data collection, analysis, and identification of benefits or areas for improvement. These surveys are self-reported by participants on improved access to employment and goods and services, reliability, and participant testimonials. The table below demonstrates relationships and metrics that these surveys will capture and quantify.

Benefit(s)

Metric(s)

Evaluation Method(s)

Data Source

Reportable Outcomes

Increase in vehicle reliability.

Disruptions of service for retired vehicle and that of the incentivized vehicle.

Participant survey with questions regarding reliability of retired vehicle and incentivized vehicle.

Voluntary participant responses to user surveys. Surveys will be administered 6, 12, and 24 months after vehicle acquisition.

Relative number and percentage of participants who report improved vehicle reliability.

Improved access to employment and goods and services as a measure of vehicle reliability

User satisfaction of the overall vehicle and their access to job opportunities and goods accessibility

Participant survey with questions about changes in employment opportunities since receiving the incentivized vehicle.

Voluntary participant responses to user surveys. Surveys will be administered 6, 12, and 24 months after vehicle acquisition.

Relative number and percentage of participants who self-report their levels of satisfaction and accessibility to job opportunities and services.

Participant-Level Data

This dataset displays the amount of funding for each project funded by EFMP Scrap and Replace and Clean Cars 4 All in the San Joaquin Valley, South Coast, Bay Area, and Sacramento air basins through December 31, 2024.