These Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) relate to the implementation of the 2024 LCFS amendments (//ww2.arb.ca.gov/rulemaking/2024/lcfs2024). The California Air Resources Board’s (CARB) Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) regulation, which appears at sections 95480 to 95503 of title 17, California Code of Regulations, is designed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions associated with the life cycle of transportation fuels used in California.  Unlike the regulation itself, these FAQ do not have the force of law. They are not intended to and cannot establish requirements beyond those that are in the LCFS regulation, nor can they supplant, replace, or amend any of the legal requirements of the regulation. Conversely, any omission or truncation of regulatory requirements does not relieve entities of their legal obligation to fully comply with all requirements of the regulation. The FAQs will be updated periodically.

Frequently Asked Questions (updated September 15, 2025)

How will the amended 2025 carbon intensity (CI) benchmarks apply to quarterly reporting and credit generation?

The amended 2025 carbon intensity benchmarks came into effect on July 1, 2025, and apply to fuels supplied in Q3 2025 and beyond. Benchmark values included in the LCFS regulation sections 95484(d) Table 1 for gasoline, 95484(e) Table 2 for diesel, and 95484(f) Table 3 for jet fuel will apply to credit generation calculations included in various sections, including section 95486.1 of the LCFS regulation, starting with Q3 2025 quarterly fuel transaction reports due by December 31, 2025.

Given there are two different 2025 CI benchmarks applicable to different parts of 2025 – is CARB also implementing two different crude CI scores from “Table 9” in 2025?

Yes. For Q1 and Q2 2025 quarterly fuel transactions, the pre-amendment[1] (#_ftn1) Table 9 values apply. For Q3 and Q4 quarterly fuel transactions, the amended Table 9 values apply as shown in the current regulation that went into effect on July 1, 2025.[2] (#_ftn2)

Will the credit true-up provisions apply to all 2025 reported transactions?

Section 95488.10(b) of the LCFS regulation specifies that when a CI is verified at a lower value than it was certified and reported, credits representing the difference will be issued to fuel reporting entities. These “true-up credits” will be issued starting with the 2025 data year and will apply to all 2025 transactions (Q1 – Q4 quarterly fuel transaction reports). CARB will issue the true-up credits after 2025 Annual Fuel Pathway Report (AFPR) verification completes in the fall of 2026.

When does the CI exceedance deficit obligation begin?

Deficit obligations resulting from CI exceedances will apply to all 2025 reporting (Q1 – Q4). The CI exceedance deficit obligation will be generated after AFPR verification completes in the fall of 2026. Section 95486.1(g) of the LCFS regulation specifies that when a CI is verified at a higher value than it was certified and reported, a deficit obligation equal to 4 times the exceedance based on reported fuel volumes and credit generation will be added to the fuel pathway holder's LRT-CBTS account. Any fuel pathway holder without an LRT-CBTS account generating a deficit obligation must create an LRT-CBTS account.

To reduce the chance of having a CI exceedance, a fuel pathway holder may request to add a margin of safety (MOS) to their pathway CI during the AFPR verification process each year, pursuant to section 95488.10(a)(6) of the LCFS regulation. A pathway holder may establish a conservative margin of safety (MOS) in fall of 2025 to be applicable to both the 2025 and 2026 data year in order to ensure no CI exceedance for the 2025 data year. To facilitate an implementation transition associated with the midyear (July 1, 2025) effective date of the amendments, any MOS established for the 2025 data year in the fall of 2025 will be applied to fuel transactions reporting for purposes of credit generation following 2025 Annual Fuel Pathway Report verification (in 2026). 

When can I request to add or update a conservative margin of safety (MOS) for my fuel pathway CI?

According to sections 95488.4(a) and 95488.10(a)(6)(B), a fuel pathway applicant or fuel pathway holder may request to add a margin of safety during the initial pathway certification or when replacing a previously certified CI with the verified operational CI during the AFPR process. Please see the previous question regarding CI exceedance deficit obligation for additional information.

On July 1, 2025, regulatory amendments to the Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) regulations came into effect months later than previously targeted. Will the California Air Resources Board (CARB) allow extra time for feedstock suppliers and fuel pathway holders to implement the sustainability requirements added to the regulation under new subsection 95488.9(g)?

CARB recognizes that regulated entities will need to adjust to implementation of new systems and processes to comply with the sustainability requirements provisions that became effective July 1, 2025. CARB will work with regulated entities to support compliance with the 2026 requirements identified in 95488.9(g)(5) based on good faith efforts and using the best available information. CARB staff understands there may be challenges with demonstrating 100% compliance with the 2026 requirements identified in 95488.9(g)(5).

Failure to meet certification requirements applicable starting in 2028 under 95488.9(g)(6) triggers the assignment of the ULSD (California ultra-low sulfur diesel) or CARBOB (California reformulated gasoline blendstock for oxygenate blending) carbon intensities to finished fuel developed from ineligible biomass. CARB staff are committed to continuing to monitor fuel pathway holder progress to meeting those 2028 requirements. 

When are attestation letters for biomass under section 95488.9(g)(5)(C) required to be maintained?

CARB staff recognizes that biomass covered under section 95488.9(g)(1)(A) may have been planted, contracted for, or harvested prior to the July 1, 2025 effective date of the amended LCFS regulation, and that fuel pathway holders and feedstock producers may need to adjust future feedstock contracts to ensure attestations and geographic shapefiles are available as required by the amended regulation. 

For existing fuel pathways: Beginning with the 2026 data year submitted in 2027 (i.e., the 2026 AFPR), holders of pathways utilizing biomass covered under section 95488.9(g)(1)(A) must maintain attestations as specified by section 95488.9(g)(5)(C). Attestation letters must cover any biomass planted, contracted for, and harvested after July 1, 2025 (if any one of these activities happened prior to July 1, 2025, the updated regulatory requirements do not apply), and must attest to the veracity of the information supplied and declare that the reported information accurately represents the geographical shapefiles or coordinates of plot boundaries (farm, plantation or forest) that are managed to produce the biomass. The attestation letters must be submitted upon request by a CARB accredited verifier or the Executive Officer.

For new fuel pathways: New fuel pathway applications that include biomass covered under section 95488.9(g)(1)(A) planted, contracted for, and harvested after July 1, 2025, must maintain an attestation letter as specified by section 95488.9(g)(5)(C). If any one of these activities (either planting, harvesting, or contracting) happened prior to July 1, 2025, the updated regulatory requirements do not apply for that volume of biomass. The attestation letter must attest to the veracity of the information supplied and declare that the reported information accurately represents the geographical shapefiles or coordinates of plot boundaries (farm, plantation or forest) that are managed to produce the biomass and meet all other requirements listed in section 95488.9(g)(5)(C). The attestation letters must be submitted upon request by a CARB accredited verifier or the CARB Executive Officer.

When are geographical shapefiles or coordinates of plot boundaries required to be submitted to CARB?

Existing fuel pathways: Beginning with annual fuel pathway report for the 2026 data year submitted in 2027 (i.e., the 2026 AFPR), holders of pathways utilizing biomass covered under section 95488.9(g)(1)(A) planted, contracted for, and delivered after July 1, 2025 must submit to CARB geographical shapefiles or coordinates of plot boundaries (farm, plantation or forest) that are managed to produce the biomass with the annual fuel pathway report.

New fuel pathways: Beginning July 1, 2025, for any biomass covered under section 95488.9(g)(1)(A) planted, contracted for, and delivered after July 1, 2025, new fuel pathway applicants must submit to CARB geographical shapefiles or coordinates of plot boundaries (farm, plantation, or forest) that are managed to produce the biomass with the fuel pathway application.

What file formats can be used to submit shapefiles or coordinates of plot boundaries? Can a centroid coordinate satisfy the geographical shapefile or coordinates of plot boundaries submission requirement?

The shapefile should clearly indicate the boundaries of the fields used to produce the crops. Farms can include the entire farm boundaries for ease or limit the boundaries to the fields actually used to produce the sustainable crops. Any fields outside the farm boundary that are leased to produce sustainable feedstocks must also be included in the shapefile. ESRI file types are preferred but any common GIS format is acceptable (see The Ultimate List of GIS Formats and Geospatial File Extensions - GIS Geography (https://gisgeography.com/gis-formats/)).

Centroid coordinates may be submitted if that is the best available data. CARB is evaluating additional options that may be used by fuel pathway holders to facilitate demonstrations of plot boundaries, including utilizing data made available by third parties reflecting crop boundaries.

Do all farms need to be included in the geographical shapefile or coordinates of plot boundaries submission even if only some of the land is used to grow biomass for transportation fuels?

The amended LCFS regulation requires that lands managed to produce biomass for a fuel pathway be represented in the geographical shapefile or coordinates of plot boundaries submission regardless of land ownership. To assist in the transition, for the first year, CARB would accept shape files that include broader boundaries of all farms used even if only some of the land is used to grow biomass for transportation fuels, if that is the best available data.

Does biomass need to be separately stored and transported to meet the sustainability requirements?

No. Conformance can be demonstrated by mass balance. For example, if 10 tons of biomass that meets all sustainability requirements was placed in a silo containing 100 tons of biomass that do not meet the sustainability requirements, up to 10 tons of biomass can be removed from that silo and used as either a feedstock or process energy for an approved pathway.

Does the requirement to submit to CARB geographical shapefiles or coordinates of plot boundaries end in 2028 when third-party certification is required?

Yes, shapefiles would no longer need to be submitted to CARB in 2028 when third-party certification is completed. However, shapefiles or some delineation of the plot boundaries will continue to be necessary to demonstrate compliance with the requirements of section 95488.9(g)(2), and so must be retained and made available to certification systems, verifiers, and/or CARB staff on request as necessary to meet recordkeeping requirements as specified by section 95491.1.

Will sourcing biomass from suppliers who are certified under a certification system approved by the CARB Executive Officer before 2028 meet the requirements applicable before 2028?

Yes. CARB staff encourage fuel pathway holders and applicants to source biomass certified by an Executive Officer approved certification system (including certification systems that have been recognized by the European Commission for the European Union Renewable Energy Directive (EU RED)) before 2028. While subsection 95488.9(g)(6) requires maintenance of those certifications beginning in 2028, such certifications provide a path to comply with the initial (post-2026) phasing-in certification requirements of section 95488.9(g)(5).

Is corn stover subject to sustainability requirements of section 95488.9(g)?

No. Corn stover is a specified source feedstock and is not subject to the sustainability requirements of section 95488.9(g); however, corn stover is subject to the specified source feedstock requirements of section 95488.8(g).

What is the relationship between the definition of “forest biomass waste” as defined under section 95481 and the use of that term in section 95488.8(g)(1)(A)3. in the list of specified source feedstocks?

Characteristics of forest-derived material that is considered to be a waste are included in the definition of “forest biomass waste” in section 95481. Section 95488.8(g)(1)(A) specifies that forest biomass waste eligible as a specified-source feedstock must include forestry residues generated as a result of activities that are conducted for the purposes of wildfire risk reduction, forest health restoration, and for the protection of critical infrastructure such as power lines and evacuation routes. Section 95488.8(g)(1)(A) also requires that forest biomass waste be sourced from non-industrial forestland in order to be considered a specified source feedstock, in recognition of the fact that forest health restoration and wildfire risk reduction treatments are needed on public lands and unmanaged lands.

Sources of forest biomass not meeting this definition may still be used as feedstock for fuel supplied to California, but will be subject to sustainability requirements in section 95488.9(g). Staff recognizes that there are cases in which clear-cutting is silviculturally appropriate and can be conducted in a manner that is consistent with California Forest Practice Rules. Feedstocks obtained from operations on industrial forestlands or from clear-cutting are subject to sustainability criteria to ensure the operations are performed in compliance with legal requirements, and to provide CARB with the information necessary to appropriately assess potential climate and land use change impacts. In section 95488.9(g)(1)(B), staff included a compliance option to the sustainability requirements for forest-derived biomass sourced from forest land that meets General Eligibility Requirements identified in Section 3.1(a) of CARB’s Compliance Offset Protocol U.S. Forest Projects (Adopted June 25, 2015), with the exception of section 3.1(a)(5).

The forest biomass waste criteria in section 95488.8(g)(1)(A) of the Amendments indicates which feedstocks are subject to the chain of custody evidence and other requirements in section 95488.8(g)(1)(B). Biomass that does not meet these criteria is subject to sustainability certification in section 95488.9(g). These designations do not specify the carbon intensity of biomass feedstocks, which is assessed during the pathway application process based on applicable data.

What considerations may apply for verifiers if fuel pathway holders are using online feedstock tracking platforms?

Entities may choose to use online feedstock tracking platforms (e.g., Veriflux, Recycle Ledger, BioLedger Aegex FACTs, etc.) to track specified source feedstocks and/or information necessary for compliance with the sustainability requirements for biomass specified in section 95488.9(g) of the LCFS regulation. These platforms are not regulated or overseen by CARB and are not required to be used for the LCFS program. However, they are being used in greater numbers to help supply chain entities with the traceability of materials. Verifiers may gain access to the unencrypted online tracking platform data when performing sampling for feedstock traceability. Verifiers may use their professional judgment to determine the value of these platforms to verification. Verifiers and other LCFS regulated entities must comply with all applicable regulatory requirements, regardless of whether feedstock tracking platforms are used. The use of online feedstock tracking platforms does not automatically reduce risk. The verification team’s sampling plan must describe whether a feedstock tracking platform is used, their assessment of the risk of misstatement, and justify why their review of data (including any tracking platform and other data management system, chain of custody documentation, and information from upstream suppliers) was sufficient to justify the verification statement submitted.

[1] (#_ftnref1)https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2020-07/2020_lcfs_fro_oal-approved_unofficial_06302020.pdf (//ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2020-07/2020_lcfs_fro_oal-approved_unofficial_06302020.pdf)

[2] (#_ftnref2)https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2025-07/2025_lcfs_fro_oal-approved_unofficial_07012025.pdf (//ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2025-07/2025_lcfs_fro_oal-approved_unofficial_07012025.pdf)